《電子技術(shù)應用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 人工智能 > 设计应用 > 面向风险的人工智能监管进展、创新与启示:基于欧盟视角的观察
面向风险的人工智能监管进展、创新与启示:基于欧盟视角的观察
网络安全与数据治理
王春晓,李怀胜
中国政法大学刑事司法学院
摘要: 随着人工智能技术发展和市场化应用下的风险衍化,人工智能监管产生并独立于人工智能治理,成为化解人工智能风险的基础理念与新兴领域。欧盟首创面向风险的人工智能监管新范式,并借助国际合作、伦理约束与风险监管框架等方式实现欧盟人工智能监管的领导力和行动力。考虑到人工智能技术与社会需求的参差,欧盟优化人工智能监管主体、监管流程以及监管内容以达到人工智能动态风险的有效监管。面对复杂的人工智能风险态势,我国可借鉴欧盟经验,在政策决定层面,基于本土国情制定面向风险的人工智能法律政策与框架体系;在应用实践层面,构建司法机关、市场监督机关以及企业等主体的交互协同机制;在产业结构层面,通过市场赋能推动人工智能监管职能下沉和产业创新发展;在通识教育层面,培育人工智能素养作为防范人工智能风险的监管“安全阀”,实现公正、和谐和创新的未来人工智能发展。
中圖分類號:TP18;D912.1文獻標識碼:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.11.015引用格式:王春曉,李懷勝.面向風險的人工智能監(jiān)管進展、創(chuàng)新與啟示:基于歐盟視角的觀察[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2024,43(11):92-100.
Risk-oriented artificial intelligence regulation: progress, innovation and inspiration from the European Union perspective
Wang Chunxiao,Li Huaisheng
School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law
Abstract: As artificial intelligence technology advances and market application risks evolve, artificial intelligence regulation has emerged and been independent of artificial intelligence governance, which has become the basic concept and emerging field of resolving artificial intelligence risks. The European Union has pioneered a new paradigm of risk-oriented AI regulation, and realized the leadership and action of EU AI regulation by means of international cooperation, ethical constraints and risk regulation framework. Considering the difference between artificial intelligence technology and social needs, the EU should optimize the main body, regulatory process and regulatory content of artificial intelligence to achieve the effective regulation of artificial intelligence risks. Faced with the complex risk situation of artificial intelligence, China can learn from the experience of the European Union, and formulate the risk-oriented legal policy and framework system of artificial intelligence based on local national conditions at the policy decision-making level. At the level of application and practice, an interactive and collaborative mechanism among judicial organs, market supervision organs and enterprises is constructed. At the industrial structure level, the market empowerment was used to promote the sinking of artificial intelligence regulatory functions and the development of industrial innovation. At the level of general education, it fosters artificial intelligence literacy as a Security Valve of regulation to mitigate risks associated with artificial intelligence, and realizes the fair, harmonious and innovative future development of artificial intelligence.
Key words : artificial intelligence regulation; European Union; Artificial Intelligence Act; artificial intelligence risk

引言

隨著人工智能系統(tǒng)普遍嵌入數(shù)字經(jīng)濟產(chǎn)業(yè),其引發(fā)的算法偏見、數(shù)據(jù)隱私、倫理失范等潛在風險也接踵而至。正如聯(lián)合國教科文組織(United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO)在《人工智能倫理建議書》所說,人工智能可以對人類大有裨益并惠及全球,但也可能加劇偏見而導致算法歧視、數(shù)字鴻溝和數(shù)字互斥,威脅文化、社會和生物多樣性并造成社會經(jīng)濟失衡。與此同時,該文件將人工智能監(jiān)管視為人工智能風險的解決之道,鼓勵各國政府采用人工智能監(jiān)管(Artificial Intelligence Regulation,AI Regulation)以預測后果、減少風險、避免有害后果、促進公民參與和應對社會挑戰(zhàn)[1]。在此背景下,歐盟逐步意識到人工智能風險引起的監(jiān)管需求,構(gòu)建起人工智能監(jiān)管范式并創(chuàng)新政策體系和實踐舉措,逐漸成為世界人工智能監(jiān)管領(lǐng)域的重要一極。

鏡鑒歐盟人工智能監(jiān)管的先進經(jīng)驗對中國的人工智能監(jiān)管改革、發(fā)展和變革具有重要的意義和作用。本文為明確歐盟人工智能監(jiān)管的領(lǐng)域界分,首先在理論基礎(chǔ)上對人工智能監(jiān)管與人工智能治理(Artificial Intelligence Governance,AI Governance)進行區(qū)分和對比,明晰歐盟面向風險的人工智能監(jiān)管的范式變革。其次,從歐盟最新出臺的《人工智能法案》(下稱《法案》)入手,分析歐盟面向風險的人工智能監(jiān)管理論與實踐動向,以展現(xiàn)歐盟在人工智能監(jiān)管領(lǐng)域的先進舉措。最后,結(jié)合歐盟人工智能監(jiān)管理論創(chuàng)新和實踐經(jīng)驗,為我國人工智能監(jiān)管發(fā)展提供有益借鑒。


本文詳細內(nèi)容請下載:

http://m.ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000006235


作者信息:

王春曉,李懷勝

(中國政法大學刑事司法學院,北京100088)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。