《電子技術(shù)應(yīng)用》
您所在的位置:首頁 > 其他 > 设计应用 > 《个人信息保护法》背景下告知同意规则的检视与改进
《个人信息保护法》背景下告知同意规则的检视与改进
网络安全与数据治理 6期
罗陈鑫
(华东政法大学经济法学院,上海200050)
摘要: 告知同意规则虽然是国际通行的个人信息保护规则,但在实践中面临着多重困境。《个人信息保护法》在坚持采纳告知同意规则的同时也对其采取了一系列修正措施。但从《个人信息保护法》的适用现状来看,告知同意规则面临的实践困境并没有得到改善,信息处理者与信息主体之间仍然处于利益失衡的状态。检视《个人信息保护法》所采取的扩张合法性基础、实施信息分类与差异化保护、细化完善同意规则等修正措施,虽然一定程度上纾解了同意规则难以落地的窘况,但仍存在诸多疏漏。应采取引入合法利益豁免机制、构建行政监管机制、发扬个人信息保护设计理念等手段作为告知同意规则改进完善的对症之策。
中圖分類號(hào):D923
文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.06.005
引用格式:羅陳鑫.《個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法》背景下告知同意規(guī)則的檢視與改進(jìn)[J].網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全與數(shù)據(jù)治理,2023,42(6):30-36.
Review and improvement of informed consent rules in the context of the implementation of Personal Information Protection Law
Luo Chenxin
(Law School of Economics, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200050, China)
Abstract: Although the informed consent rule is an internationally accepted personal information protection rule, it faces multiple dilemmas in practice. While adopting the informed consent rule, the Personal Information Protection Law also adopts a series of amendments to it. However, from the current situation of the application of the Personal Information Protection Law, the practical dilemma faced by the informed consent rule has not been resolved, and the interests between the information processor and the information subject are still in a state of imbalance. Examining the amendment measures adopted by the Personal Information Protection Law, such as expanding the legal basis, implementing the classification and differentiated protection of information, and refining the consent rules, although to a certain extent, the dilemma that the consent rules are difficult to be implemented is alleviated, there are still many problems to be solved. It is necessary to introduce the legal interest exemption mechanism, build the administrative supervision mechanism, and carry forward the design concept of personal information protection as the countermeasures to improve the informed consent rule.
Key words : informed consent; Personal Information Protection Law; exemption of legitimate interests; balance of interests; personal information protection design

0     引言

大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代個(gè)人信息保護(hù)極端重要。自《中華人民共和國個(gè)人信息保護(hù)法》(以下簡稱“《個(gè)保法》”)頒布以來,我國已經(jīng)構(gòu)建起了個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的基本制度體系?!秱€(gè)保法》在規(guī)則構(gòu)造上繼續(xù)沿用了告知同意模式,但這一模式其實(shí)在頒布之前就面臨著諸多質(zhì)疑與挑戰(zhàn)。美國著名的隱私法學(xué)者Solove提出的“同意困境”理論總結(jié)了告知同意所面臨的種種窘境,得到了很多學(xué)者的認(rèn)同與引用。有一些學(xué)者認(rèn)為針對(duì)“同意困境”,應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)告知同意規(guī)則作出修正;另外一些觀點(diǎn)較為激進(jìn)的學(xué)者則認(rèn)為不應(yīng)當(dāng)把同意作為個(gè)人信息處理的正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ)。應(yīng)當(dāng)說,告知同意規(guī)則的存與廢不是一個(gè)簡單的是非題,而是一個(gè)復(fù)雜的綜合題,這一規(guī)則從根本上觸及我國的個(gè)人信息保護(hù)制度,需要全面審慎地考量。《個(gè)保法》在立法選擇上沒有直接廢除告知同意規(guī)則,而是采取了擴(kuò)張合法性基礎(chǔ)、構(gòu)建信息分類與差異化保護(hù)制度、細(xì)化完善同意規(guī)則等一系列措施對(duì)其進(jìn)行修正,以期避免告知同意規(guī)則制度目的的落空。但這些措施是否真正有效紓解了我國信息保護(hù)實(shí)踐中的“同意困境”仍然難以得到肯定。時(shí)至今日,告知同意規(guī)則在實(shí)踐上仍然面臨告知不到位、同意不真實(shí)和救濟(jì)路徑缺失等問題。因此,有必要對(duì)《個(gè)保法》背景下的告知同意規(guī)則進(jìn)行再檢視,探索進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化的對(duì)癥之策。



本文詳細(xì)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)下載:http://m.ihrv.cn/resource/share/2000005370




作者信息:

羅陳鑫

(華東政法大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)院,上海200050)


微信圖片_20210517164139.jpg

此內(nèi)容為AET網(wǎng)站原創(chuàng),未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。

相關(guān)內(nèi)容